| 
				
				
This article was first published in 2008.
	
			 | 
		
	
	
E-G-R stands for Exhaust Gas Recirculation. It’s 
been around for decades but it’s now becomingly increasingly important in both 
diesel and spark ignition engines. 
Computer-controlled, often externally-cooled, and 
potentially of much greater use than for just decreasing emissions, EGR is 
making a major resurgence. So what are the emissions and fuel economy 
implications of EGR? Some, including reducing full-load exhaust gas temps in 
turbo engines without the need to run rich air/fuel ratios, are not at all what 
you’d expect!
So let’s take a new look at EGR.
Exhaust Gas Recirculation
Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) is a process 
whereby some of the engine exhaust is fed back into the intake. 
External EGR is achieved by means of a pipe 
that connects the exhaust to the inlet manifold, with a control valve interposed 
in this line to regulate EGR flow. 
For exhaust gas to flow in this pipe, the pressure 
in the exhaust must be higher than the pressure in the intake. 
In conventionally throttled spark ignition 
engines, this pressure differential is present in varying degrees at all loads, 
and is highest in part-throttle conditions. However, in throttle-less engines 
like diesels and some direct injection spark ignition engines, this pressure 
differential is highly dependent on exhaust backpressure. In turbocharged 
engines, exhaust pressure in front of the turbine is always higher than intake 
manifold pressure.
Internal EGR occurs when the valve timing 
is arranged so that there is some back-flow into the combustion chamber from the 
exhaust, or all exhaust gases are not pushed out of the combustion chamber on 
the exhaust stroke. Such engines normally have variable valve timing so that 
internal EGR occurs only when dictated by the ECU; when internal EGR is 
required, this is achieved by increasing valve overlap.
	 
	
	
	
Internal EGR appears to be a better approach (at 
least on engines with variable valve timing) as it avoids the need for external 
pipes and valves, reducing cost and improving packaging. However, external EGR 
has a significant advantage – the recycled exhaust gas can be cooled before 
being fed back into the intake. This is termed cooled EGR. 
In cooled EGR systems, the amount of EGR flow that 
actually occurs depends not only on the pressure differential between the 
exhaust and intake, but also on the pressure drop through the EGR cooler. The 
actual amount of EGR occurring can be indirectly measured by the intake airflow 
meter – more on this in a moment.
Traditional EGR Systems
EGR was first widely adopted in the 1970s as a 
means of reducing oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions.
	 
	
	
	
In the depicted Nissan system, the amount of EGR 
depended on two factors – engine load (registered as intake manifold vacuum) and 
coolant temperature (monitored by a thermal vacuum valve). The higher the 
manifold vacuum (ie the lower the load), the greater the EGR. EGR was fully 
activated only at coolant temperatures above 63 degrees C, was partially 
activated at 40 – 63 degrees C, and was inactive at temperatures below 40 
degrees C. 
	 
	
	
	
This Leyland EGR flow control valve consisted of a 
diaphragm and a valve. The diaphragm was subjected to manifold vacuum and so 
valve lift decreased with load.
However, many EGR valves used more complex 
operation that this - for example, monitoring exhaust backpressure as well as 
intake manifold pressure, so preventing EGR on the over-run and at idle. 
Even in this period, some cars additionally used 
solenoid control of the vacuum signal to the EGR valve, the solenoid being 
controlled by a dedicated electrical unit.
Electronically-Controlled EGR Systems
Given that the optimal EGR valve opening varies 
with load, coolant temperature, pressure differential between exhaust and intake 
manifold (and other factors), electronically-controlled operation of the EGR 
valve has obvious advantages. All external EGR systems fitted to current diesel 
and spark ignition cars use electronically-controlled flow valves.
	 
	
	
	
This Bosch spark ignition EGR system uses a 
vacuum-controlled EGR valve that is electronically controlled by the ECU.
	 
	
	
	
This Honda system uses an 
electronically-controlled EGR valve that incorporates a feedback sensor to 
determine the actual valve opening that is occurring.
	 
	
	
	
Here is the electronically-controlled Honda valve 
that is used on the Honda Insight. 
	 
	
	
	
This is a generic diagram of a typical diesel car 
EGR system. The important point to note is the presence of the airflow meter. By 
comparing the modelled airflow requirements of the engine (based on rpm, intake 
manifold pressure, intake air temp and volumetric efficiency) with the actual 
amount of air being breathed, the amount of EGR that is occurring can be 
calculated and adjusted as required. 
	
	
		
			
				
				
Turbo 
Sizing
In 
turbo engines, where the EGR source is in front of the turbine, exhaust energy 
previously available to drive the turbo is reduced. If the amount of EGR is 
sufficiently large, the turbo will need to be sized to take this into account.  
			 | 
		
	
	
EGR for Emissions Reductions
EGR reduces the emission of oxides of nitrogen 
(NOx). 
NOx emissions are problematic because their 
generation is associated with lean combustion. Diesels (that most frequently run 
air/fuel ratios of 50:1 – 100:1, with a richest air/fuel ratio of about 20:1) 
and spark ignition engines run in stratified combustion and lean cruise modes 
(eg air/fuel ratios of 20:1 – 25:1) produce large amounts of NOx. EGR is 
therefore most often used on engines running lean air/fuel ratios.
EGR reduces NOx emissions in three ways.
EGR for Fuel Economy Improvements
In engines that use throttles, high pumping losses 
occur in part-throttle conditions. That is, the engine needs to do work in order 
to draw air past the partly closed throttle. One result of this is that as load 
decreases and the throttle is closed to a greater extent, Specific Fuel 
Consumption (ie the fuel consumed per power produced) becomes increasingly 
worse. 
	 
	
	
	
This graph shows the phenomenon. At 100 percent 
load (ie wide open throttle) this engine has a minimum Specific Fuel Consumption 
(SPC) of 0.43 – see the bottom curve. With the throttle open only 25 per cent, 
the minimum SPC has risen by 63 per cent, while at 2000 rpm, it has risen by a 
massive 117 per cent!
EGR can help reduce pumping losses. This is 
because the cylinders can still be filled, but without all the gas having to be 
drawn past the throttle. 
Up until a certain point, increasing EGR results 
in lower fuel consumption. However, once that point has been passed, further 
increases in EGR result in poor combustion behaviour, so increasing emissions of 
hydrocarbons (HC) and Specific Fuel Consumption. About 40 per cent EGR appears 
to be the current practical maximum in spark ignition engines. 
In addition to reducing pumping losses, EGR can be 
used to reduce the fuel enrichment otherwise needed at high loads. This is 
especially relevant in current downsized turbocharged engines that spend more 
time at high loads than conventionally-sized engines. 
In highly stressed turbo engines, fuel enrichment 
is traditionally used to cool the combustion process and avoid detonation. 
Recirculation of cooled exhaust gas can be used to perform the same function, 
with a consequent improvement in high load fuel economy. The reduced fuel 
consumption also serves to decrease HC and CO2 emissions. 
	 
	
	
	
UK researchers working for the engine component 
manufacturer Mahle conducted testing on a 2-litre, 4-valves-per-cylinder, direct 
injected, turbocharged and intercooled petrol engine. The EGR system was of the 
external type and used a cooler that reduced exhaust gas temp to just 20 degrees 
C. The system added the cooled exhaust gas well ahead of the turbo compressor 
(note: so apparently not after the throttle body). 
When running at high power outputs, the engine 
used a modest amount of fuel enrichment and a large amount of cooled EGR to 
achieve Specific Fuel Consumption up to 16 per cent better than with fuel 
enrichment alone. Under the same operating conditions, the reduction in NOx was 
about 30 per cent, the reduction in CO was 70 per cent, and HC was 80 per cent. 
The authors also state that “an additional benefit 
of the cooled EGR technique may be that higher geometric compression ratios can 
be tolerated in boosted downsized engines...”.
Incidentally, in other Mahle literature, it is 
suggested that on a 140kW engine using 15 per cent EGR and with an exhaust 
temperature of 980 degrees C, an EGR cooler rated at 24kW is required. 
Another point is that other literature suggests 
that either hot or cold EGR reduces exhaust gas temperatures, important in 
highly stressed turbocharged engines. 
Finally, implicit in any discussion of using EGR 
for improving fuel economy is that leaner air/fuel ratios can be used (often in 
conjunction with a NOx adsorbing cat converter) without exceeding legislated NOx 
limits. 
Conclusion
EGR has a long-proven history in reducing NOx 
emissions. Lean air/fuel ratios are associated with heightened NOx outputs and 
so reducing this specific emission is a current priority in engine development. 
Reductions in combustion temperature and pumping 
losses can be achieved using EGR (and especially cooled EGR), reducing the need 
for fuel enrichment at high loads in turbocharged engines and improving 
part-load fuel economy. 
As a relatively simple and low cost technology, 
expect both internal and cooled external EGR systems to be very widely used on 
both diesel and petrol engines.
	
	
		
			
				
				
References
Bae, 
C., Koo, J. & Cho, Y, (2001), Exhaust Gas Recirculation in a 
Spark-Ignition LPG Engine, Third Asia-Pacific Conference on Combustion, 
Seoul, Korea 
Billiet, 
W.E., 1985, Automotive Electronic and Electrical Systems, Prentice 
Hall 
Bosch, 
(1999) Gasoline-Engine Management 
Bosch, 
(2004) Diesel-Engine Management  
Cairns, 
A., Blaxill, H. & Irlam, G., 2006, Exhaust Gas Recirculation for Improved 
Part and Full Load Fuel Economy in a Turbocharged Gasoline Engine, SAE 
International 2006-01-0047 
Honda, 
(2000) Insight Service Manual 
Leyland 
Motor Corporation of Australia, 1981, Emission Control Systems 
Ganser, 
J, 2007, Exhaust Gas Recirculation, Mahle Powertrain 
Majewski, 
WA & Khair, MK (2006), Diesel Emissions and Their Control, SAE 
International 
Nissan 
Motor Co, 1976, Emission Control System 
Repco, 
(1972) Repco Engine Service Manual 
			 |